A12 9800 vs Xeon Silver 4110
Description
The 9800 is based on Excavator architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9800 gets a score of 100.8 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 2.8 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9800 gets a score of 100.8 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 2.8 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
50654
Core
Bristol Ridge
Skylake-SP
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
Socket AM4
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2X2048 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
11264 kB
Date
September 2016
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
37.86k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
100.79k points
281.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9800
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
13.42k
18.78k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
17.61k
16.25k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.77k
3.99k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.06k
6.8k (x2.22)
TOTAL
37.86k
45.82k (x1.21)
Multithread
9800
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
40.46k
133.55k (x3.3)
Test#2 (FP)
43.18k
108.43k (x2.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.78k
30.02k (x2.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.37k
9.48k (x2.17)
TOTAL
100.79k
281.48k (x2.79)
Performance/W
9800
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
622 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
664 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
197 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
67 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
1551 points/W
3311 points/W
Performance/GHz
9800
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3195 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4193 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
897 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
728 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
9013 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4