A12 9800 vs Core i9-9880H
Description
The 9800 is based on Excavator architecture while the i9-9880H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9800 gets a score of 100.8 k points while the i9-9880H gets 381.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 3.8 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9800 gets a score of 100.8 k points while the i9-9880H gets 381.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 3.8 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
906ed
Core
Bristol Ridge
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
Socket AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2X2048 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
16386 kB
Date
September 2016
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
37.86k points
73.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
100.79k points
381.53k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9800
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.42k
27.81k (x2.07)
Test#2 (FP)
17.61k
25.88k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.77k
5.65k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.06k
14.19k (x4.64)
TOTAL
37.86k
73.53k (x1.94)
Multithread
9800
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
40.46k
175.69k (x4.34)
Test#2 (FP)
43.18k
166.56k (x3.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.78k
35.04k (x2.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.37k
4.23k (x0.97)
TOTAL
100.79k
381.53k (x3.79)
Performance/W
9800
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
622 points/W
3904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
664 points/W
3701 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
197 points/W
779 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
67 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
1551 points/W
8478 points/W
Performance/GHz
9800
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
3195 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4193 points/GHz
5392 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
897 points/GHz
1178 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
728 points/GHz
2956 points/GHz
TOTAL
9013 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4