A12 9800 vs Core i7-9850H
Description
The 9800 is based on Excavator architecture while the i7-9850H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9800 gets a score of 100.8 k points while the i7-9850H gets 289.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9850H is 2.9 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9800 gets a score of 100.8 k points while the i7-9850H gets 289.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9850H is 2.9 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
906ed
Core
Bristol Ridge
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
Socket AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2X2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2016
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
37.86k points
49.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
100.79k points
289.3k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9800
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.42k
19.83k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
17.61k
16.52k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.77k
3.87k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.06k
9.02k (x2.95)
TOTAL
37.86k
49.24k (x1.3)
Multithread
9800
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
40.46k
130.19k (x3.22)
Test#2 (FP)
43.18k
121.44k (x2.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.78k
28.05k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.37k
9.62k (x2.2)
TOTAL
100.79k
289.3k (x2.87)
Performance/W
9800
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
622 points/W
2893 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
664 points/W
2699 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
197 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
67 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
1551 points/W
6429 points/W
Performance/GHz
9800
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
3195 points/GHz
4311 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4193 points/GHz
3591 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
897 points/GHz
841 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
728 points/GHz
1961 points/GHz
TOTAL
9013 points/GHz
10703 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4