| | | | | | |

A12 9800 vs Core i7-8550U


Description
The 9800 is based on Excavator architecture while the i7-8550U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9800 gets a score of 100.8 k points while the i7-8550U gets 166.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-8550U is 1.6 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
660f51
806ea
Core
Bristol Ridge
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
Socket AM4
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2X2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2016
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
37.86k points
64.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
100.79k points
166.12k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9800
i7-8550U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.42k
25.37k (x1.89)
Test#2 (FP)
17.61k
22.6k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.77k
5.13k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.06k
11.1k (x3.63)
TOTAL
37.86k
64.2k (x1.7)

Multithread

9800

i7-8550U
Test#1 (Integers)
40.46k
72.82k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
43.18k
71.71k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.78k
17.35k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.37k
4.24k (x0.97)
TOTAL
100.79k
166.12k (x1.65)

Performance/W
9800
i7-8550U
Test#1 (Integers)
622 points/W
4855 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
664 points/W
4781 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
197 points/W
1157 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
67 points/W
282 points/W
TOTAL
1551 points/W
11075 points/W

Performance/GHz
9800
i7-8550U
Test#1 (Integers)
3195 points/GHz
6343 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4193 points/GHz
5650 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
897 points/GHz
1282 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
728 points/GHz
2774 points/GHz
TOTAL
9013 points/GHz
16049 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4