A12 9800 vs Core i5-5200U
Description
The 9800 is based on Excavator architecture while the i5-5200U is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9800 gets a score of 100.8 k points while the i5-5200U gets 68.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 9800 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9800 gets a score of 100.8 k points while the i5-5200U gets 68.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 9800 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
306d4
Core
Bristol Ridge
Broadwell-U
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
Socket AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2X2048 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2016
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
37.86k points
31.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
100.79k points
68.69k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9800
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.42k
13.58k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
17.61k
12.14k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.77k
3.18k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.06k
2.92k (x0.95)
TOTAL
37.86k
31.81k (x0.84)
Multithread
9800
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
40.46k
28.89k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
43.18k
28.74k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.78k
7.31k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.37k
3.74k (x0.86)
TOTAL
100.79k
68.69k (x0.68)
Performance/W
9800
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
622 points/W
1926 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
664 points/W
1916 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
197 points/W
488 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
67 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
1551 points/W
4579 points/W
Performance/GHz
9800
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3195 points/GHz
5029 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4193 points/GHz
4497 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
897 points/GHz
1176 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
728 points/GHz
1080 points/GHz
TOTAL
9013 points/GHz
11782 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4