| | | | | | |

A12 9800 vs Core i5-4570S


Description
The 9800 is based on Excavator architecture while the i5-4570S is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9800 gets a score of 100.8 k points while the i5-4570S gets 138.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-4570S is 1.4 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
660f51
306c3
Core
Bristol Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
Socket AM4
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2X2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2016
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
37.86k points
39.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
100.79k points
138.55k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9800
i5-4570S
Test#1 (Integers)
13.42k
20.16k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
17.61k
10.78k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.77k
4.47k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.06k
4.41k (x1.44)
TOTAL
37.86k
39.82k (x1.05)

Multithread

9800

i5-4570S
Test#1 (Integers)
40.46k
74.28k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
43.18k
41.76k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.78k
16k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.37k
6.51k (x1.49)
TOTAL
100.79k
138.55k (x1.37)

Performance/W
9800
i5-4570S
Test#1 (Integers)
622 points/W
1143 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
664 points/W
642 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
197 points/W
246 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
67 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
1551 points/W
2132 points/W

Performance/GHz
9800
i5-4570S
Test#1 (Integers)
3195 points/GHz
5600 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4193 points/GHz
2995 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
897 points/GHz
1241 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
728 points/GHz
1226 points/GHz
TOTAL
9013 points/GHz
11061 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4