A12 9800 vs Core i5-4300U
Description
The 9800 is based on Excavator architecture while the i5-4300U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9800 gets a score of 100.8 k points while the i5-4300U gets 64.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 9800 is 1.6 times faster than the i5-4300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9800 gets a score of 100.8 k points while the i5-4300U gets 64.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 9800 is 1.6 times faster than the i5-4300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
40651
Core
Bristol Ridge
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
Socket AM4
BGA 1168
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2X2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2016
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
37.86k points
32.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
100.79k points
64.79k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9800
i5-4300U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.42k
16.54k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
17.61k
8.71k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.77k
3.69k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.06k
3.24k (x1.06)
TOTAL
37.86k
32.18k (x0.85)
Multithread
9800
i5-4300U
Test#1 (Integers)
40.46k
31.64k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
43.18k
21.59k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.78k
8.46k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.37k
3.09k (x0.71)
TOTAL
100.79k
64.79k (x0.64)
Performance/W
9800
i5-4300U
Test#1 (Integers)
622 points/W
2110 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
664 points/W
1439 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
197 points/W
564 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
67 points/W
206 points/W
TOTAL
1551 points/W
4319 points/W
Performance/GHz
9800
i5-4300U
Test#1 (Integers)
3195 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4193 points/GHz
3003 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
897 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
728 points/GHz
1116 points/GHz
TOTAL
9013 points/GHz
11097 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4