A12 9800 vs Core i5-10200H
Description
The 9800 is based on Excavator architecture while the i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9800 gets a score of 100.8 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 2.6 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9800 gets a score of 100.8 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 2.6 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
a0652
Core
Bristol Ridge
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
Socket AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2X2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2016
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
37.86k points
67.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
100.79k points
260.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9800
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.42k
26.37k (x1.97)
Test#2 (FP)
17.61k
23.91k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.77k
5.57k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.06k
11.68k (x3.82)
TOTAL
37.86k
67.53k (x1.78)
Multithread
9800
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
40.46k
114.08k (x2.82)
Test#2 (FP)
43.18k
114.71k (x2.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.78k
27.33k (x2.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.37k
4.25k (x0.97)
TOTAL
100.79k
260.38k (x2.58)
Performance/W
9800
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
622 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
664 points/W
3277 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
197 points/W
781 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
67 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
1551 points/W
7439 points/W
Performance/GHz
9800
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
3195 points/GHz
6433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4193 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
897 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
728 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
9013 points/GHz
16470 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4