A12 9800 vs Core i3-9100T
Description
The 9800 is based on Excavator architecture while the i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9800 gets a score of 100.8 k points while the i3-9100T gets 192.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 1.9 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9800 gets a score of 100.8 k points while the i3-9100T gets 192.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 1.9 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
906eb
Core
Bristol Ridge
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
Socket AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2X2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2016
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
37.86k points
60.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
100.79k points
192.88k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9800
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.42k
24.89k (x1.85)
Test#2 (FP)
17.61k
21.82k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.77k
4.83k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.06k
8.63k (x2.82)
TOTAL
37.86k
60.16k (x1.59)
Multithread
9800
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
40.46k
89.4k (x2.21)
Test#2 (FP)
43.18k
81.19k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.78k
18.06k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.37k
4.24k (x0.97)
TOTAL
100.79k
192.88k (x1.91)
Performance/W
9800
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
622 points/W
2554 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
664 points/W
2320 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
197 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
67 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
1551 points/W
5511 points/W
Performance/GHz
9800
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3195 points/GHz
6727 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4193 points/GHz
5897 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
897 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
728 points/GHz
2331 points/GHz
TOTAL
9013 points/GHz
16260 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4