A12 9800 vs Ryzen 3 3250U
Description
The 9800 is based on Excavator architecture while the 3250U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9800 gets a score of 100.8 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 9800 is 1.3 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9800 gets a score of 100.8 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 9800 is 1.3 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
810f81
Core
Bristol Ridge
Dali
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
Socket AM4
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2X2048 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2016
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
37.86k points
33.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
100.79k points
77.88k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9800
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.42k
9.33k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
17.61k
17.1k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.77k
3.57k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.06k
3.26k (x1.07)
TOTAL
37.86k
33.26k (x0.88)
Multithread
9800
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
40.46k
22.14k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
43.18k
40.04k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.78k
10.71k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.37k
5k (x1.15)
TOTAL
100.79k
77.88k (x0.77)
Performance/W
9800
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
622 points/W
1476 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
664 points/W
2669 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
197 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
67 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
1551 points/W
5192 points/W
Performance/GHz
9800
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
3195 points/GHz
2667 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4193 points/GHz
4886 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
897 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
728 points/GHz
932 points/GHz
TOTAL
9013 points/GHz
9503 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4