A12 9720P vs Core i3-8130U
Description
The 9720P is based on Excavator architecture while the i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9720P gets a score of 65.3 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8130U is 1.4 times faster than the 9720P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9720P gets a score of 65.3 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8130U is 1.4 times faster than the 9720P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
806ea
Core
Bristol Ridge
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA FP4
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2016
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
28.37k points
47.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
65.26k points
88.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9720P
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.13k
21.09k (x2.08)
Test#2 (FP)
13.41k
19.41k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.9k
4.05k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.94k
2.8k (x1.44)
TOTAL
28.37k
47.35k (x1.67)
Multithread
9720P
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
26.79k
38.23k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
27.87k
38.89k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.23k
8.75k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.37k
2.47k (x1.04)
TOTAL
65.26k
88.35k (x1.35)
Performance/W
9720P
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
1786 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1858 points/W
2593 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
548 points/W
584 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
158 points/W
165 points/W
TOTAL
4351 points/W
5890 points/W
Performance/GHz
9720P
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
2813 points/GHz
6204 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3724 points/GHz
5708 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
805 points/GHz
1190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
538 points/GHz
823 points/GHz
TOTAL
7880 points/GHz
13925 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4