A10 9630P vs N100
Description
The 9630P is based on Excavator architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9630P gets a score of 32.9 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the is 2.7 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9630P gets a score of 32.9 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the is 2.7 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
b06e0
Core
Bristol Ridge
Alder Lake-N
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
45 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2016
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
23.7k points
36.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
32.92k points
88.29k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
8.52k
15.23k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
11.04k
11.04k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.36k
5.54k (x2.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.79k
4.98k (x2.78)
TOTAL
23.7k
36.79k (x1.55)
Multithread
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
12.83k
37.07k (x2.89)
Test#2 (FP)
14.44k
32.57k (x2.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.6k
14.75k (x4.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
3.9k (x1.9)
TOTAL
32.92k
88.29k (x2.68)
Performance/W
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
285 points/W
6178 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
321 points/W
5429 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
649 points/W
TOTAL
732 points/W
14715 points/W
Performance/GHz
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
2582 points/GHz
4479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3344 points/GHz
3247 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/GHz
1631 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/GHz
1464 points/GHz
TOTAL
7183 points/GHz
10821 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4