A10 9630P vs Core i7-5960X
Description
The 9630P is based on Excavator architecture while the i7-5960X is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9630P gets a score of 32.9 k points while the i7-5960X gets 294.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5960X is 8.9 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9630P gets a score of 32.9 k points while the i7-5960X gets 294.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5960X is 8.9 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
306f2
Core
Bristol Ridge
Haswell-E
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
45 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
20480 kB
Date
June 2016
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
23.7k points
13.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
32.92k points
294.29k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9630P
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
8.52k
6.6k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
11.04k
3.8k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.36k
1.41k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.79k
1.34k (x0.75)
TOTAL
23.7k
13.16k (x0.56)
Multithread
9630P
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
12.83k
146.65k (x11.43)
Test#2 (FP)
14.44k
100.72k (x6.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.6k
34.09k (x9.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
12.83k (x6.25)
TOTAL
32.92k
294.29k (x8.94)
Performance/W
9630P
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
285 points/W
1047 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
321 points/W
719 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80 points/W
243 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
732 points/W
2102 points/W
Performance/GHz
9630P
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
2582 points/GHz
1887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3344 points/GHz
1086 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/GHz
403 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/GHz
384 points/GHz
TOTAL
7183 points/GHz
3759 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4