Mobile 3020e vs Xeon Silver 4208
Description
The 3020e is based on Zen architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3020e gets a score of 52.4 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 5.9 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3020e gets a score of 52.4 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 5.9 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
820f01
50657
Core
Dali
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/16
TDP
6 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
11264 kB
Date
January 2020
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
29.34k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.42k points
311.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3020e
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
9.28k
16.86k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
14.56k
12.08k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.44k
3.37k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.06k
6.29k (x3.06)
TOTAL
29.34k
38.61k (x1.32)
Multithread
3020e
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
150.99k (x9.59)
Test#2 (FP)
28.63k
118.54k (x4.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
33.44k (x5.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.17k
8.6k (x3.97)
TOTAL
52.42k
311.57k (x5.94)
Performance/W
3020e
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
2625 points/W
1776 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4771 points/W
1395 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
979 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
361 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
8737 points/W
3666 points/W
Performance/GHz
3020e
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
3570 points/GHz
5269 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5602 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
1054 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
792 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
TOTAL
11287 points/GHz
12065 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4