Mobile 3020e vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The 3020e is based on Zen architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3020e gets a score of 52.4 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 4.5 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3020e gets a score of 52.4 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 4.5 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
820f01
406f1
Core
Dali
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/16
TDP
6 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2020
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
29.34k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.42k points
237.83k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3020e
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
9.28k
12.16k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
14.56k
11.82k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.44k
3.02k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.06k
2.4k (x1.16)
TOTAL
29.34k
29.39k (x1)
Multithread
3020e
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
103.77k (x6.59)
Test#2 (FP)
28.63k
102.28k (x3.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
26.13k (x4.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.17k
5.65k (x2.6)
TOTAL
52.42k
237.83k (x4.54)
Performance/W
3020e
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2625 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4771 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
979 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
361 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
8737 points/W
2798 points/W
Performance/GHz
3020e
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3570 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5602 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
792 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
11287 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4