Mobile 3020e vs Core m3-7Y30
Description
The 3020e is based on Zen architecture while the m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3020e gets a score of 52.4 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the m3-7Y30 is 1 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3020e gets a score of 52.4 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the m3-7Y30 is 1 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
820f01
806e9
Core
Dali
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1515
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
6 W
4.5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2020
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
29.34k points
25.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.42k points
52.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3020e
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
9.28k
10.02k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
14.56k
9.22k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.44k
2.04k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.06k
4.31k (x2.1)
TOTAL
29.34k
25.6k (x0.87)
Multithread
3020e
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
21.75k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
28.63k
20.51k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
4.97k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.17k
5.56k (x2.57)
TOTAL
52.42k
52.78k (x1.01)
Performance/W
3020e
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
2625 points/W
4832 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4771 points/W
4557 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
979 points/W
1104 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
361 points/W
1236 points/W
TOTAL
8737 points/W
11730 points/W
Performance/GHz
3020e
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
3570 points/GHz
3852 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5602 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
786 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
792 points/GHz
1659 points/GHz
TOTAL
11287 points/GHz
9844 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4