Mobile 3020e vs Core i7-4790K
Description
The 3020e is based on Zen architecture while the i7-4790K is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3020e gets a score of 52.4 k points while the i7-4790K gets 215.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4790K is 4.1 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3020e gets a score of 52.4 k points while the i7-4790K gets 215.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4790K is 4.1 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
820f01
306c3
Core
Dali
Haswell
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
6 W
88 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2020
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
29.34k points
52.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.42k points
215.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3020e
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
9.28k
26.16k (x2.82)
Test#2 (FP)
14.56k
14.78k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.44k
6.01k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.06k
5.52k (x2.68)
TOTAL
29.34k
52.47k (x1.79)
Multithread
3020e
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
107.76k (x6.84)
Test#2 (FP)
28.63k
70.84k (x2.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
27.99k (x4.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.17k
8.87k (x4.09)
TOTAL
52.42k
215.47k (x4.11)
Performance/W
3020e
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
2625 points/W
1225 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4771 points/W
805 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
979 points/W
318 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
361 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
8737 points/W
2448 points/W
Performance/GHz
3020e
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
3570 points/GHz
5946 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5602 points/GHz
3359 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
1366 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
792 points/GHz
1254 points/GHz
TOTAL
11287 points/GHz
11925 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4