Mobile 3020e vs Core i3-8130U
Description
The 3020e is based on Zen architecture while the i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3020e gets a score of 52.4 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8130U is 1.7 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3020e gets a score of 52.4 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8130U is 1.7 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
820f01
806ea
Core
Dali
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2020
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
29.34k points
47.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.42k points
88.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3020e
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.28k
21.09k (x2.27)
Test#2 (FP)
14.56k
19.41k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.44k
4.05k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.06k
2.8k (x1.36)
TOTAL
29.34k
47.35k (x1.61)
Multithread
3020e
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
38.23k (x2.43)
Test#2 (FP)
28.63k
38.89k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
8.75k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.17k
2.47k (x1.14)
TOTAL
52.42k
88.35k (x1.69)
Performance/W
3020e
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
2625 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4771 points/W
2593 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
979 points/W
584 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
361 points/W
165 points/W
TOTAL
8737 points/W
5890 points/W
Performance/GHz
3020e
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
3570 points/GHz
6204 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5602 points/GHz
5708 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
1190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
792 points/GHz
823 points/GHz
TOTAL
11287 points/GHz
13925 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4