Mobile 3020e vs N97
Description
The 3020e is based on Zen architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3020e gets a score of 40 k points while the gets 86.7 k points.
Summarizing, the is 2.2 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3020e gets a score of 40 k points while the gets 86.7 k points.
Summarizing, the is 2.2 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
820f01
b06e0
Core
Dali
Gracemont
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
6 W
12 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
28.92k points
26.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
40.02k points
86.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
9.02k
9.94k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
14.61k
7.74k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.28k
3.83k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.01k
4.76k (x2.37)
TOTAL
28.92k
26.27k (x0.91)
Multithread
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
11.9k
36.67k (x3.08)
Test#2 (FP)
21.9k
28.03k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.54k
15.47k (x3.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.69k
6.53k (x3.87)
TOTAL
40.02k
86.72k (x2.17)
Performance/W
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
1983 points/W
3056 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3650 points/W
2336 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
756 points/W
1289 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
545 points/W
TOTAL
6670 points/W
7226 points/W
Performance/GHz
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
3468 points/GHz
2761 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5619 points/GHz
2150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1261 points/GHz
1064 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
773 points/GHz
1322 points/GHz
TOTAL
11121 points/GHz
7297 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4