Mobile 3020e vs Ryzen 7 4700U
Description
The 3020e is based on Zen architecture while the 4700U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3020e gets a score of 52.4 k points while the 4700U gets 269.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4700U is 5.1 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3020e gets a score of 52.4 k points while the 4700U gets 269.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4700U is 5.1 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
820f01
860f01
Core
Dali
Renoir
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/8
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2020
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
29.34k points
49.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.42k points
269.56k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3020e
4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.28k
10.38k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
14.56k
22.63k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.44k
8.52k (x2.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.06k
7.99k (x3.88)
TOTAL
29.34k
49.53k (x1.69)
Multithread
3020e
4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
86.74k (x5.51)
Test#2 (FP)
28.63k
128.69k (x4.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
48.71k (x8.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.17k
5.41k (x2.49)
TOTAL
52.42k
269.56k (x5.14)
Performance/W
3020e
4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
2625 points/W
5783 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4771 points/W
8579 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
979 points/W
3248 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
361 points/W
360 points/W
TOTAL
8737 points/W
17970 points/W
Performance/GHz
3020e
4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
3570 points/GHz
2533 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5602 points/GHz
5520 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
2078 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
792 points/GHz
1949 points/GHz
TOTAL
11287 points/GHz
12080 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4