Mobile 3020e vs Ryzen 3 3250U
Description
Both models 3020e and 3250U are based on Zen architecture.
Zen is the first Ryzen generation. It uses 14nm FinFET process from GlobalFoundries. It has support for DDR4 memory and ECC. Comes with 64kB instruction + 32kB data L1 cache and 512kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3020e gets a score of 52.4 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3250U is 1.5 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Zen is the first Ryzen generation. It uses 14nm FinFET process from GlobalFoundries. It has support for DDR4 memory and ECC. Comes with 64kB instruction + 32kB data L1 cache and 512kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3020e gets a score of 52.4 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3250U is 1.5 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
820f01
810f81
Core
Dali
Dali
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2020
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
29.34k points
33.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.42k points
77.88k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3020e
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.28k
9.33k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
14.56k
17.1k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.44k
3.57k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.06k
3.26k (x1.58)
TOTAL
29.34k
33.26k (x1.13)
Multithread
3020e
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
22.14k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
28.63k
40.04k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
10.71k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.17k
5k (x2.31)
TOTAL
52.42k
77.88k (x1.49)
Performance/W
3020e
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
2625 points/W
1476 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4771 points/W
2669 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
979 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
361 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
8737 points/W
5192 points/W
Performance/GHz
3020e
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
3570 points/GHz
2667 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5602 points/GHz
4886 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
792 points/GHz
932 points/GHz
TOTAL
11287 points/GHz
9503 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4