Mobile 3020e vs Athlon X4 950
Description
The 3020e is based on Zen architecture while the 950 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3020e gets a score of 52.4 k points while the 950 gets 99.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 950 is 1.9 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3020e gets a score of 52.4 k points while the 950 gets 99.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 950 is 1.9 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
820f01
660f51
Core
Dali
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
6 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2020
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
29.34k points
34.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.42k points
99.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3020e
950
Test#1 (Integers)
9.28k
12.44k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
14.56k
15.96k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.44k
3.54k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.06k
3k (x1.46)
TOTAL
29.34k
34.93k (x1.19)
Multithread
3020e
950
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
40.75k (x2.59)
Test#2 (FP)
28.63k
42.07k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
12.53k (x2.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.17k
4.45k (x2.05)
TOTAL
52.42k
99.8k (x1.9)
Performance/W
3020e
950
Test#1 (Integers)
2625 points/W
627 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4771 points/W
647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
979 points/W
193 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
361 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
8737 points/W
1535 points/W
Performance/GHz
3020e
950
Test#1 (Integers)
3570 points/GHz
3274 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5602 points/GHz
4199 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
931 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
792 points/GHz
788 points/GHz
TOTAL
11287 points/GHz
9193 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4