Mobile 3020e vs A10 9630P
Description
The 3020e is based on Zen architecture while the 9630P is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3020e gets a score of 52.4 k points while the 9630P gets 32.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3020e is 1.6 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3020e gets a score of 52.4 k points while the 9630P gets 32.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3020e is 1.6 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
820f01
660f51
Core
Dali
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
6 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2020
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
29.34k points
23.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
52.42k points
32.92k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3020e
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
9.28k
8.52k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
14.56k
11.04k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.44k
2.36k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.06k
1.79k (x0.87)
TOTAL
29.34k
23.7k (x0.81)
Multithread
3020e
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
12.83k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
28.63k
14.44k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
3.6k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.17k
2.05k (x0.95)
TOTAL
52.42k
32.92k (x0.63)
Performance/W
3020e
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
2625 points/W
285 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4771 points/W
321 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
979 points/W
80 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
361 points/W
46 points/W
TOTAL
8737 points/W
732 points/W
Performance/GHz
3020e
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
3570 points/GHz
2582 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5602 points/GHz
3344 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
714 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
792 points/GHz
543 points/GHz
TOTAL
11287 points/GHz
7183 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4