| | | | | | |

Core i9-13980HX vs i9-10980XE


Description
The i9-13980HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13980HX gets a score of 1317.5 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13980HX is 1.1 times faster than the i9-10980XE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
50657
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.6 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
24/32
18/36
TDP
55 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+16x4096 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
25344 kB
Date
January 2023
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
116.05k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
1317.53k points
1241.12k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13980HX
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
54.07k
29.53k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
30.22k
22.59k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.67k
5.99k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
10.22k (x0.63)
TOTAL
116.05k
68.33k (x0.59)

Multithread

i9-13980HX

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
597.18k
587.06k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
466.55k
496.41k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225.13k
134.66k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.67k
22.99k (x0.8)
TOTAL
1317.53k
1241.12k (x0.94)

Performance/W
i9-13980HX
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
10858 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8483 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4093 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
521 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
23955 points/W
7522 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13980HX
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
9655 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5396 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2798 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2874 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
20723 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4