| | | | | | |

Core i9-13980HX vs i9-10940X


Description
The i9-13980HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i9-10940X is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13980HX gets a score of 1317.5 k points while the i9-10940X gets 1088.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13980HX is 1.2 times faster than the i9-10940X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
50657
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.6 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
24/32
14/28
TDP
55 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+16x4096 kB
14x1024 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
19712 kB
Date
January 2023
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
116.05k points
72.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
1317.53k points
1088.11k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13980HX
i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
54.07k
29.75k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
30.22k
27.44k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.67k
5.81k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
9.05k (x0.56)
TOTAL
116.05k
72.04k (x0.62)

Multithread

i9-13980HX

i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
597.18k
485.37k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
466.55k
472.7k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225.13k
113.09k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.67k
16.95k (x0.59)
TOTAL
1317.53k
1088.11k (x0.83)

Performance/W
i9-13980HX
i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
10858 points/W
2942 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8483 points/W
2865 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4093 points/W
685 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
521 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
23955 points/W
6595 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13980HX
i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
9655 points/GHz
6197 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5396 points/GHz
5717 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2798 points/GHz
1210 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2874 points/GHz
1885 points/GHz
TOTAL
20723 points/GHz
15009 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4