Core i9-13980HX vs i9-10900KF
Description
The i9-13980HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13980HX gets a score of 1317.5 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13980HX is 1.6 times faster than the i9-10900KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13980HX gets a score of 1317.5 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13980HX is 1.6 times faster than the i9-10900KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b0671
a0655
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.6 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
24/32
10/20
TDP
55 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+16x4096 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2023
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
116.05k points
90.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
1317.53k points
825.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13980HX
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
54.07k
35.87k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
30.22k
31.43k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.67k
7.34k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
15.73k (x0.98)
TOTAL
116.05k
90.37k (x0.78)
Multithread
i9-13980HX
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
597.18k
377.56k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
466.55k
347.59k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225.13k
88.08k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.67k
12.24k (x0.43)
TOTAL
1317.53k
825.47k (x0.63)
Performance/W
i9-13980HX
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
10858 points/W
3020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8483 points/W
2781 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4093 points/W
705 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
521 points/W
98 points/W
TOTAL
23955 points/W
6604 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-13980HX
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
9655 points/GHz
6898 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5396 points/GHz
6044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2798 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2874 points/GHz
3025 points/GHz
TOTAL
20723 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4