| | | | | | |

Core i9-13980HX vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D


Description
The i9-13980HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 7950X3D is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13980HX gets a score of 1317.5 k points while the 7950X3D gets 1687.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 7950X3D is 1.3 times faster than the i9-13980HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
a60f12
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Raphael
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.6 GHz
5.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
AM5
Cores/Threads
24/32
16/32
TDP
55 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+16x4096 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
131072 kB
Date
January 2023
February 2023
Mean monothread perf.
116.05k points
122.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
1317.53k points
1687.86k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13980HX
7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
54.07k
41.61k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
30.22k
31.34k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.67k
16.95k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
33.08k (x2.06)
TOTAL
116.05k
122.98k (x1.06)

Multithread

i9-13980HX

7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
597.18k
647k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
466.55k
533.47k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225.13k
279.07k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.67k
228.31k (x7.96)
TOTAL
1317.53k
1687.86k (x1.28)

Performance/W
i9-13980HX
7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
10858 points/W
5392 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8483 points/W
4446 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4093 points/W
2326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
521 points/W
1903 points/W
TOTAL
23955 points/W
14065 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13980HX
7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
9655 points/GHz
7300 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5396 points/GHz
5499 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2798 points/GHz
2973 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2874 points/GHz
5803 points/GHz
TOTAL
20723 points/GHz
21575 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4