| | | | | | |

Core i9-13980HX vs Ryzen 9 7945HX


Description
The i9-13980HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 7945HX is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13980HX gets a score of 1317.5 k points while the 7945HX gets 1313.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13980HX is 1 times faster than the 7945HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
a60f12
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Dragon Range
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.6 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
BGA-FL1
Cores/Threads
24/32
16/32
TDP
55 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+16x4096 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
65536 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
116.05k points
113.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
1317.53k points
1313.94k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13980HX
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
54.07k
37.43k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
30.22k
30.7k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.67k
15.16k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
29.78k (x1.85)
TOTAL
116.05k
113.07k (x0.97)

Multithread

i9-13980HX

7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
597.18k
556.68k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
466.55k
482.32k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225.13k
225.46k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.67k
49.48k (x1.73)
TOTAL
1317.53k
1313.94k (x1)

Performance/W
i9-13980HX
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
10858 points/W
10121 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8483 points/W
8770 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4093 points/W
4099 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
521 points/W
900 points/W
TOTAL
23955 points/W
23890 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13980HX
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
9655 points/GHz
6932 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5396 points/GHz
5685 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2798 points/GHz
2807 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2874 points/GHz
5515 points/GHz
TOTAL
20723 points/GHz
20939 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4