Core i9-13980HX vs Ryzen 5 3600
Description
The i9-13980HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13980HX gets a score of 1317.5 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13980HX is 3.8 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13980HX gets a score of 1317.5 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13980HX is 3.8 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b0671
870f10
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
AM4
Cores/Threads
24/32
6/12
TDP
55 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+16x4096 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
32768 kB
Date
January 2023
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
116.05k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
1317.53k points
348.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13980HX
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
54.07k
16.04k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
30.22k
24.47k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.67k
8.38k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
21.66k (x1.35)
TOTAL
116.05k
70.55k (x0.61)
Multithread
i9-13980HX
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
597.18k
113.63k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
466.55k
143.55k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225.13k
63.84k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.67k
27.34k (x0.95)
TOTAL
1317.53k
348.35k (x0.26)
Performance/W
i9-13980HX
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
10858 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8483 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4093 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
521 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
23955 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-13980HX
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
9655 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5396 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2798 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2874 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
20723 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4