Core i9-13980HX vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The i9-13980HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13980HX gets a score of 1317.5 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13980HX is 4.3 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13980HX gets a score of 1317.5 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13980HX is 4.3 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b0671
800f82
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
AM4
Cores/Threads
24/32
6/12
TDP
55 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+16x4096 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2023
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
116.05k points
58.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
1317.53k points
303.4k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13980HX
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
54.07k
14.08k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
30.22k
22.56k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.67k
5.19k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
16.71k (x1.04)
TOTAL
116.05k
58.53k (x0.5)
Multithread
i9-13980HX
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
597.18k
86.62k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
466.55k
168.1k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225.13k
43.51k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.67k
5.16k (x0.18)
TOTAL
1317.53k
303.4k (x0.23)
Performance/W
i9-13980HX
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
10858 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8483 points/W
2586 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4093 points/W
669 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
521 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
23955 points/W
4668 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-13980HX
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
9655 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5396 points/GHz
6265 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2798 points/GHz
1440 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2874 points/GHz
4642 points/GHz
TOTAL
20723 points/GHz
16259 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4