Core i9-13980HX vs i9-13900KF
Description
Both models i9-13980HX and i9-13900KF are based on Raptor Lake architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13980HX gets a score of 1317.5 k points while the i9-13900KF gets 1660 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900KF is 1.3 times faster than the i9-13980HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13980HX gets a score of 1317.5 k points while the i9-13900KF gets 1660 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900KF is 1.3 times faster than the i9-13980HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b0671
b0671
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.6 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
24/32
24/32
TDP
55 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+16x4096 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
36864 kB
Date
January 2023
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
116.05k points
128.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
1317.53k points
1660.01k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13980HX
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
54.07k
61.1k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
30.22k
31.23k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.67k
17.57k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
18.89k (x1.17)
TOTAL
116.05k
128.79k (x1.11)
Multithread
i9-13980HX
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
597.18k
767.22k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
466.55k
576.38k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225.13k
284.31k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.67k
32.09k (x1.12)
TOTAL
1317.53k
1660.01k (x1.26)
Performance/W
i9-13980HX
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
10858 points/W
6138 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8483 points/W
4611 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4093 points/W
2274 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
521 points/W
257 points/W
TOTAL
23955 points/W
13280 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-13980HX
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
9655 points/GHz
10535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5396 points/GHz
5384 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2798 points/GHz
3030 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2874 points/GHz
3257 points/GHz
TOTAL
20723 points/GHz
22206 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4