| | | | | | |

Core i9-13980HX vs i7-13700HX


Description
Both models i9-13980HX and i7-13700HX are based on Raptor Lake architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13980HX gets a score of 1317.5 k points while the i7-13700HX gets 1070.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13980HX is 1.2 times faster than the i7-13700HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
b06f2
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.6 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
24/32
16/24
TDP
55 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+16x4096 kB
8x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
116.05k points
109.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
1317.53k points
1070.39k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13980HX
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
54.07k
48.57k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
30.22k
28.78k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.67k
15.6k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
16.46k (x1.02)
TOTAL
116.05k
109.41k (x0.94)

Multithread

i9-13980HX

i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
597.18k
486.01k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
466.55k
386.1k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225.13k
173.21k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.67k
25.08k (x0.87)
TOTAL
1317.53k
1070.39k (x0.81)

Performance/W
i9-13980HX
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
10858 points/W
8836 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8483 points/W
7020 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4093 points/W
3149 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
521 points/W
456 points/W
TOTAL
23955 points/W
19462 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13980HX
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
9655 points/GHz
9715 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5396 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2798 points/GHz
3120 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2874 points/GHz
3293 points/GHz
TOTAL
20723 points/GHz
21882 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4