| | | | | | |

Core i9-13980HX vs i5-13600K


Description
Both models i9-13980HX and i5-13600K are based on Raptor Lake architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13980HX gets a score of 1317.5 k points while the i5-13600K gets 1023.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13980HX is 1.3 times faster than the i5-13600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
b0671
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.6 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
24/32
14/20
TDP
55 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+16x4096 kB
6x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2023
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
116.05k points
115.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
1317.53k points
1023.59k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13980HX
i5-13600K
Test#1 (Integers)
54.07k
54.36k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
30.22k
29.93k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.67k
15.39k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
15.52k (x0.96)
TOTAL
116.05k
115.19k (x0.99)

Multithread

i9-13980HX

i5-13600K
Test#1 (Integers)
597.18k
457.21k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
466.55k
360.82k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225.13k
172.64k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.67k
32.91k (x1.15)
TOTAL
1317.53k
1023.59k (x0.78)

Performance/W
i9-13980HX
i5-13600K
Test#1 (Integers)
10858 points/W
3658 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8483 points/W
2887 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4093 points/W
1381 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
521 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
23955 points/W
8189 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13980HX
i5-13600K
Test#1 (Integers)
9655 points/GHz
10658 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5396 points/GHz
5869 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2798 points/GHz
3018 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2874 points/GHz
3042 points/GHz
TOTAL
20723 points/GHz
22587 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4