| | | | | | |

Core i9-13980HX vs i7-12700K


Description
The i9-13980HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i7-12700K is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13980HX gets a score of 1317.5 k points while the i7-12700K gets 1034.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13980HX is 1.3 times faster than the i7-12700K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
90672
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Alder Lake
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.6 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
24/32
12/20
TDP
55 W
190 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
8x32/4x64+8x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+16x4096 kB
8x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
25600 kB
Date
January 2023
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
116.05k points
110.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
1317.53k points
1034.06k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13980HX
i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
54.07k
52.13k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
30.22k
28.97k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.67k
15.04k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
14.07k (x0.87)
TOTAL
116.05k
110.2k (x0.95)

Multithread

i9-13980HX

i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
597.18k
458.8k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
466.55k
377.45k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225.13k
171.31k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.67k
26.51k (x0.92)
TOTAL
1317.53k
1034.06k (x0.78)

Performance/W
i9-13980HX
i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
10858 points/W
2415 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8483 points/W
1987 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4093 points/W
902 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
521 points/W
140 points/W
TOTAL
23955 points/W
5442 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13980HX
i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
9655 points/GHz
10425 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5396 points/GHz
5794 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2798 points/GHz
3008 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2874 points/GHz
2813 points/GHz
TOTAL
20723 points/GHz
22040 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4