| | | | | | |

Core i9-13980HX vs i9-11900H


Description
The i9-13980HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13980HX gets a score of 1317.5 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13980HX is 2.3 times faster than the i9-11900H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
806d1
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.6 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
24/32
8/16
TDP
55 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+16x4096 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2023
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
116.05k points
89.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
1317.53k points
584.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13980HX
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
54.07k
33.38k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
30.22k
27.12k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.67k
11.69k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
17k (x1.06)
TOTAL
116.05k
89.19k (x0.77)

Multithread

i9-13980HX

i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
597.18k
249.83k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
466.55k
237.26k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225.13k
84.18k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.67k
13.2k (x0.46)
TOTAL
1317.53k
584.47k (x0.44)

Performance/W
i9-13980HX
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
10858 points/W
5552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8483 points/W
5272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4093 points/W
1871 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
521 points/W
293 points/W
TOTAL
23955 points/W
12988 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13980HX
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
9655 points/GHz
6812 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5396 points/GHz
5535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2798 points/GHz
2386 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2874 points/GHz
3469 points/GHz
TOTAL
20723 points/GHz
18202 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4