| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900KS vs Ryzen 9 5950X


Description
The i9-13900KS is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 5950X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900KS gets a score of 1708.6 k points while the 5950X gets 1081 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900KS is 1.6 times faster than the 5950X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
a20f10
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Vermeer
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
6 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
24/32
16/32
TDP
150 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
16x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
January 2023
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
127.35k points
87.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
1708.56k points
1080.96k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900KS
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
57.69k
22.91k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
33.34k
26.24k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.55k
11.87k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.76k
26.28k (x1.4)
TOTAL
127.35k
87.3k (x0.69)

Multithread

i9-13900KS

5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
757.76k
359.17k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
626.83k
479.04k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
294.93k
214.59k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.05k
28.16k (x0.97)
TOTAL
1708.56k
1080.96k (x0.63)

Performance/W
i9-13900KS
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
5052 points/W
3421 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4179 points/W
4562 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1966 points/W
2044 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
194 points/W
268 points/W
TOTAL
11390 points/W
10295 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900KS
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
9616 points/GHz
4676 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5557 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2925 points/GHz
2423 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3127 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
TOTAL
21226 points/GHz
17817 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4