| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900KS vs i9-13900KF


Description
Both models i9-13900KS and i9-13900KF are based on Raptor Lake architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900KS gets a score of 1708.6 k points while the i9-13900KF gets 1660 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900KS is 1 times faster than the i9-13900KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
b0671
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
6 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
24/32
24/32
TDP
150 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
36864 kB
Date
January 2023
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
127.35k points
128.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
1708.56k points
1660.01k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900KS
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
57.69k
61.1k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
33.34k
31.23k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.55k
17.57k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.76k
18.89k (x1.01)
TOTAL
127.35k
128.79k (x1.01)

Multithread

i9-13900KS

i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
757.76k
767.22k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
626.83k
576.38k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
294.93k
284.31k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.05k
32.09k (x1.1)
TOTAL
1708.56k
1660.01k (x0.97)

Performance/W
i9-13900KS
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
5052 points/W
6138 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4179 points/W
4611 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1966 points/W
2274 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
194 points/W
257 points/W
TOTAL
11390 points/W
13280 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900KS
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
9616 points/GHz
10535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5557 points/GHz
5384 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2925 points/GHz
3030 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3127 points/GHz
3257 points/GHz
TOTAL
21226 points/GHz
22206 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4