| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900KS vs i7-11700F


Description
The i9-13900KS is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900KS gets a score of 1708.6 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900KS is 3.3 times faster than the i7-11700F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
a0671
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
6 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
24/32
8/16
TDP
150 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2023
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
127.35k points
89.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
1708.56k points
512.32k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900KS
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
57.69k
32.55k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
33.34k
26.95k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.55k
10.76k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.76k
19.32k (x1.03)
TOTAL
127.35k
89.58k (x0.7)

Multithread

i9-13900KS

i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
757.76k
232.06k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
626.83k
203.56k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
294.93k
72.89k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.05k
3.81k (x0.13)
TOTAL
1708.56k
512.32k (x0.3)

Performance/W
i9-13900KS
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
5052 points/W
3570 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4179 points/W
3132 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1966 points/W
1121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
194 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
11390 points/W
7882 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900KS
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
9616 points/GHz
6642 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5557 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2925 points/GHz
2196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3127 points/GHz
3943 points/GHz
TOTAL
21226 points/GHz
18281 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4