| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900KF vs Xeon E5-2680 v4


Description
The i9-13900KF is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900KF gets a score of 1660 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900KF is 1.4 times faster than the E5-2680 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
406f1
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.8 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
24/32
14/28
TDP
125 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
14x256 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
35840 kB
Date
September 2022
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
128.79k points
41.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
1660.01k points
1162.63k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900KF
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
61.1k
17.8k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
31.23k
16.51k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.57k
4.47k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.89k
2.56k (x0.14)
TOTAL
128.79k
41.35k (x0.32)

Multithread

i9-13900KF

E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
767.22k
494.82k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
576.38k
514.13k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
284.31k
132.87k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.09k
20.8k (x0.65)
TOTAL
1660.01k
1162.63k (x0.7)

Performance/W
i9-13900KF
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6138 points/W
4124 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4611 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2274 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
257 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
13280 points/W
9689 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900KF
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
10535 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5384 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3030 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3257 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
TOTAL
22206 points/GHz
12529 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4