| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900KF vs Ryzen 7 5800X


Description
The i9-13900KF is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 5800X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900KF gets a score of 1660 k points while the 5800X gets 558.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900KF is 3 times faster than the 5800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
a20f10
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Vermeer
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.8 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
24/32
8/16
TDP
125 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
32768 kB
Date
September 2022
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
128.79k points
89.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
1660.01k points
558.42k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900KF
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
61.1k
24.14k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
31.23k
26.3k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.57k
12.09k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.89k
26.54k (x1.4)
TOTAL
128.79k
89.07k (x0.69)

Multithread

i9-13900KF

5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
767.22k
183.54k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
576.38k
237.27k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
284.31k
107.95k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.09k
29.66k (x0.92)
TOTAL
1660.01k
558.42k (x0.34)

Performance/W
i9-13900KF
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
6138 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4611 points/W
2260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2274 points/W
1028 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
257 points/W
282 points/W
TOTAL
13280 points/W
5318 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900KF
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
10535 points/GHz
5137 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5384 points/GHz
5596 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3030 points/GHz
2571 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3257 points/GHz
5646 points/GHz
TOTAL
22206 points/GHz
18951 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4