Core i9-13900KF vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Description
The i9-13900KF is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900KF gets a score of 1660 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900KF is 3.9 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900KF gets a score of 1660 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900KF is 3.9 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b0671
800f82
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
24/32
8/16
TDP
125 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2022
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
128.79k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
1660.01k points
431.14k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900KF
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
61.1k
15.34k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
31.23k
25.75k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.57k
5.79k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.89k
17.95k (x0.95)
TOTAL
128.79k
64.83k (x0.5)
Multithread
i9-13900KF
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
767.22k
123.07k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
576.38k
239.3k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
284.31k
60.6k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.09k
8.18k (x0.25)
TOTAL
1660.01k
431.14k (x0.26)
Performance/W
i9-13900KF
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6138 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4611 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2274 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
257 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
13280 points/W
4106 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-13900KF
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
10535 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5384 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3030 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3257 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
22206 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4