| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900K vs Xeon E5-2680 v2


Description
The i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900K gets a score of 1501.3 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 2.7 times faster than the E5-2680 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
306e4
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
24/32
10 /20
TDP
125 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+4x4096 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
25600 kB
Date
October 2022
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
129.15k points
28.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
1763.08k points
551.1k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-13900K
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
31.93k
11.96k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
31.54k
10.73k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.8k
4.59k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.82k
4.31k (x0.21)
TOTAL
103.09k
31.6k (x0.31)

Multithread

i9-13900K

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
522.07k
218.24k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
584.17k
206.92k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
344.38k
100.37k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.36k
11.45k (x0.45)
TOTAL
1475.97k
536.99k (x0.36)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-13900K
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
31.8k
10.55k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
32.83k
10.02k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.37k
3.99k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.13k
3.66k (x0.17)
TOTAL
104.13k
28.23k (x0.27)

Multithread

i9-13900K

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
532.97k
215.04k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
596.78k
230.43k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
342.96k
96.87k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.6k
8.76k (x0.31)
TOTAL
1501.31k
551.1k (x0.37)

Performance/W
i9-13900K
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
4264 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4774 points/W
2004 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2744 points/W
842 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
229 points/W
76 points/W
TOTAL
12011 points/W
4792 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900K
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
5483 points/GHz
2931 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5660 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3166 points/GHz
1109 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3644 points/GHz
1017 points/GHz
TOTAL
17953 points/GHz
7841 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4