Core i9-13900K vs Xeon E5-2660 v2
Description
The i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the E5-2660 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900K gets a score of 1501.3 k points while the E5-2660 v2 gets 459.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 3.3 times faster than the E5-2660 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900K gets a score of 1501.3 k points while the E5-2660 v2 gets 459.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 3.3 times faster than the E5-2660 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b0671
306e4
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.8 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
24/32
10 /20
TDP
125 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+4x4096 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
25600 kB
Date
October 2022
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
129.15k points
19.48k points
Mean multithread perf.
1763.08k points
459.31k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-13900K
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
31.8k
7.26k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
32.83k
6.9k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.37k
2.77k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.13k
2.55k (x0.12)
TOTAL
104.13k
19.48k (x0.19)
Multithread
i9-13900K
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
532.97k
180.2k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
596.78k
191.43k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
342.96k
80.22k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.6k
7.46k (x0.26)
TOTAL
1501.31k
459.31k (x0.31)
Performance/W
i9-13900K
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
4264 points/W
1897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4774 points/W
2015 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2744 points/W
844 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
229 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
12011 points/W
4835 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-13900K
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
5483 points/GHz
2420 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5660 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3166 points/GHz
923 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3644 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
17953 points/GHz
6495 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4