| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900K vs i9-10900K


Description
The i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900K gets a score of 1763.1 k points while the i9-10900K gets 685.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 2.6 times faster than the i9-10900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
a0655
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.8 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
24/32
10/20
TDP
125 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+4x4096 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
20480 kB
Date
October 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
129.15k points
80.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
1763.08k points
685.65k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-13900K
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
31.93k
19.5k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
31.54k
28.01k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.8k
7.45k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.82k
15.82k (x0.76)
TOTAL
103.09k
70.79k (x0.69)

Multithread

i9-13900K

i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
522.07k
194.49k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
584.17k
312.59k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
344.38k
89.14k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.36k
12.58k (x0.5)
TOTAL
1475.97k
608.81k (x0.41)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900K
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
58.6k
32.67k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
33.29k
28.49k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
6.53k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.49k
12.72k (x0.65)
TOTAL
129.15k
80.41k (x0.62)

Multithread

i9-13900K

i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
804.04k
307.39k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
613.45k
298.47k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
311.08k
72.94k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
34.5k
6.85k (x0.2)
TOTAL
1763.08k
685.65k (x0.39)

Performance/W
i9-13900K
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4908 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2489 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
276 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
14105 points/W
5485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900K
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
10104 points/GHz
6282 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
5479 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3064 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3360 points/GHz
2445 points/GHz
TOTAL
22268 points/GHz
15463 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4