| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900K vs i7-14700KF


Description
Both models i9-13900K and i7-14700KF are based on Raptor Lake architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900K gets a score of 1763.1 k points while the i7-14700KF gets 1561.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 1.1 times faster than the i7-14700KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
b0671
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Raptor Lake-R
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.8 GHz
5.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
24/32
20/28
TDP
125 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
8x32/12x64+8x48/12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+4x4096 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
33792 kB
Date
October 2022
October 2023
Mean monothread perf.
129.15k points
127.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
1763.08k points
1561.88k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900K
i7-14700KF
Test#1 (Integers)
58.6k
57.7k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
33.29k
32.63k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
17.61k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.49k
19.7k (x1.01)
TOTAL
129.15k
127.64k (x0.99)

Multithread

i9-13900K

i7-14700KF
Test#1 (Integers)
804.04k
700.72k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
613.45k
538.15k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
311.08k
269.22k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
34.5k
53.8k (x1.56)
TOTAL
1763.08k
1561.88k (x0.89)

Performance/W
i9-13900K
i7-14700KF
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/W
5606 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4908 points/W
4305 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2489 points/W
2154 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
276 points/W
430 points/W
TOTAL
14105 points/W
12495 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900K
i7-14700KF
Test#1 (Integers)
10104 points/GHz
10303 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3064 points/GHz
3145 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3360 points/GHz
3518 points/GHz
TOTAL
22268 points/GHz
22793 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4