| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900K vs i5-5675R


Description
The i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i5-5675R is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900K gets a score of 1763.1 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 9.1 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
40671
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Bradwell-H
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
24/32
4/4
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+4x4096 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2022
June 2015
Mean monothread perf.
129.15k points
51.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
1763.08k points
194.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-13900K
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
9.77k
4.14k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
24.52k
14.35k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.17k
4.94k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.37k
5.47k (x0.26)
TOTAL
72.83k
28.91k (x0.4)

Multithread

i9-13900K

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
145.21k
16.02k (x0.11)
Test#2 (FP)
444.95k
54.6k (x0.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
318.3k
18.69k (x0.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.2k
16.87k (x0.62)
TOTAL
935.66k
106.18k (x0.11)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-13900K
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
31.93k
12.86k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
31.54k
16.85k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.8k
5.19k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.82k
5.49k (x0.26)
TOTAL
103.09k
40.39k (x0.39)

Multithread

i9-13900K

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
522.07k
50.07k (x0.1)
Test#2 (FP)
584.17k
64.61k (x0.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
344.38k
19.84k (x0.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.36k
17.09k (x0.67)
TOTAL
1475.97k
151.6k (x0.1)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-13900K
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
31.8k
12.88k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
32.83k
18.27k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.37k
5.12k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.13k
5.45k (x0.26)
TOTAL
104.13k
41.72k (x0.4)

Multithread

i9-13900K

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
532.97k
49.91k (x0.09)
Test#2 (FP)
596.78k
70.3k (x0.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
342.96k
19.69k (x0.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.6k
16.92k (x0.59)
TOTAL
1501.31k
156.83k (x0.1)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900K
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
58.6k
21.91k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
33.29k
18.59k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
5.2k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.49k
5.72k (x0.29)
TOTAL
129.15k
51.43k (x0.4)

Multithread

i9-13900K

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
804.04k
84.92k (x0.11)
Test#2 (FP)
613.45k
72.09k (x0.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
311.08k
20.13k (x0.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
34.5k
17.07k (x0.49)
TOTAL
1763.08k
194.2k (x0.11)

Performance/W
i9-13900K
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/W
1306 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4908 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2489 points/W
310 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
276 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
14105 points/W
2988 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900K
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
10104 points/GHz
6087 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
5164 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3064 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3360 points/GHz
1590 points/GHz
TOTAL
22268 points/GHz
14286 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4