| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900K vs Ryzen 7 5800U


Description
The i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 5800U is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900K gets a score of 1763.1 k points while the 5800U gets 314.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 5.6 times faster than the 5800U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
a50f00
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Cezanne
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
24/32
8/16
TDP
125 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+4x4096 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2022
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
129.15k points
71.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
1763.08k points
314.55k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900K
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
58.6k
18.34k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
33.29k
22.78k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
9.45k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.49k
20.59k (x1.06)
TOTAL
129.15k
71.16k (x0.55)

Multithread

i9-13900K

5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
804.04k
102.74k (x0.13)
Test#2 (FP)
613.45k
143.27k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
311.08k
58.13k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
34.5k
10.41k (x0.3)
TOTAL
1763.08k
314.55k (x0.18)

Performance/W
i9-13900K
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/W
6849 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4908 points/W
9551 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2489 points/W
3875 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
276 points/W
694 points/W
TOTAL
14105 points/W
20970 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900K
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
10104 points/GHz
4168 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
5178 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3064 points/GHz
2147 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3360 points/GHz
4679 points/GHz
TOTAL
22268 points/GHz
16172 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4