| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900K vs Ryzen 5 5625U


Description
The i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 5625U is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900K gets a score of 1763.1 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 6.3 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
a50f00
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Barcelo
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
24/32
6/12
TDP
125 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+4x4096 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2022
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
129.15k points
70.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
1763.08k points
281.26k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900K
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
58.6k
18.57k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
33.29k
22.03k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
9.55k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.49k
20.5k (x1.05)
TOTAL
129.15k
70.65k (x0.55)

Multithread

i9-13900K

5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
804.04k
92.92k (x0.12)
Test#2 (FP)
613.45k
128.4k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
311.08k
54.82k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
34.5k
5.13k (x0.15)
TOTAL
1763.08k
281.26k (x0.16)

Performance/W
i9-13900K
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/W
6194 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4908 points/W
8560 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2489 points/W
3654 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
276 points/W
342 points/W
TOTAL
14105 points/W
18750 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900K
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
10104 points/GHz
4318 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
5124 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3064 points/GHz
2221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3360 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
TOTAL
22268 points/GHz
16431 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4