Core i9-13900K vs Ryzen 5 3500X
Description
The i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 3500X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900K gets a score of 1763.1 k points while the 3500X gets 373.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 4.7 times faster than the 3500X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900K gets a score of 1763.1 k points while the 3500X gets 373.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 4.7 times faster than the 3500X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b0671
870f10
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.8 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
24/32
6/12
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+4x4096 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
32768 kB
Date
October 2022
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
129.15k points
66.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
1763.08k points
373.61k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900K
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
58.6k
15.48k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
33.29k
22.91k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
7.1k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.49k
21.11k (x1.08)
TOTAL
129.15k
66.61k (x0.52)
Multithread
i9-13900K
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
804.04k
90.39k (x0.11)
Test#2 (FP)
613.45k
139.1k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
311.08k
53.2k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
34.5k
90.92k (x2.64)
TOTAL
1763.08k
373.61k (x0.21)
Performance/W
i9-13900K
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/W
1391 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4908 points/W
2140 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2489 points/W
818 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
276 points/W
1399 points/W
TOTAL
14105 points/W
5748 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-13900K
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
10104 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
5588 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3064 points/GHz
1732 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3360 points/GHz
5149 points/GHz
TOTAL
22268 points/GHz
16246 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4