Core i9-13900K vs Ryzen 5 2600X
Description
The i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900K gets a score of 1763.1 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 5.3 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900K gets a score of 1763.1 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 5.3 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b0671
800f82
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
24/32
6/12
TDP
125 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+4x4096 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
October 2022
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
129.15k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
1763.08k points
333.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900K
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
58.6k
15.75k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
33.29k
26.29k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
5.91k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.49k
18.48k (x0.95)
TOTAL
129.15k
66.44k (x0.51)
Multithread
i9-13900K
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
804.04k
94.49k (x0.12)
Test#2 (FP)
613.45k
182.53k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
311.08k
45.95k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
34.5k
10.15k (x0.29)
TOTAL
1763.08k
333.12k (x0.19)
Performance/W
i9-13900K
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/W
995 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4908 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2489 points/W
484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
276 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
14105 points/W
3507 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-13900K
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
10104 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
6261 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3064 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3360 points/GHz
4401 points/GHz
TOTAL
22268 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4